Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 12
Section Discours, pragmatique et interaction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419101011
Published online 28 June 2024
  1. Ambroise, B. (2013). Pragmatique de la vérité: sens, représentation et contexte, de G. Frege à Ch. Travis. Corela [En ligne], HS-14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, J. L. (1991) [1970]. Quand dire c’est faire, Paris: Seuil. Bybee, J. (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, J. (2015). Language Change, Cambridge University Press. Cappelle, B. (2017). What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions? Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line. 115–151. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft, W. (2000). Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach, Harlow, Longman. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fetzer, A. (2012). Contexts in interaction: relating pragmatic wastebaskets. What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. Finkbeiner, Meibauer & Schumacher (Eds), 105–127. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, C., Kay, P., O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The case of Let Alone. Language, 64, 501–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finkbeiner, R. (2019). Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames [Google Scholar]
  8. François, J. (2008). Les grammaires de construction, un bâtiment ouvert aux quatre vents, Cahier du CRISCO, 26. [Google Scholar]
  9. François, J. (2010). Trois monographies récentes sur les parcours de grammaticalisation et la linguistique de l’usage. Syntaxe & Sémantique, 11, 185–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Givón, T. (2009). The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldberg, A. E. (2013). Constructionist approach, In Hoffmann and Trousdale, 15–31. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H. P. (1979). Logique et conversation, Communications, 30, 57–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français, Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
  15. Heine B., Kuteva T. (2007). The Genesis of Grammar, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Katz, J. (1977). Propositional structure and illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts, Thomas T. Crowell New York. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kay, P. (1990). Even, Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Stanford. [Google Scholar]
  19. Legallois, D. (2018). “La notion de construction”, in Encyclopédie grammaticale du français, en ligne: encyclogram.fr. [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris, C., Guérette, V., Latraverse, F., Paillet, J.P. (1974). Fondements de la théorie des signes. Langages, 35, 15–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nikiforidou, K. (2009). Constructional Analysis. In: F. Brisard, J.-O. Őstman, J. Verschueren (eds.), Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5], 16–32. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  22. Traugott, E., Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.