EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 191 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 191 (2024) 02009 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 13
Section Francophonie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419102009
Published online 28 June 2024
  1. Ågren, J. (1973). Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique: Fréquences et facteurs. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbiers, S. (2009). Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua, 119, 1607–1623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbiers, S. et Cornips, L. (2002). Introduction to syntactic microvariation. In: S. Barbiers, L. Cornips et S. van der Kleij (éds.), Syntactic Microvariation, Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut, 2–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B et Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, S. et al. (2009). Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beltrama, A. (2020). Social meaning in semantics and pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14, e12398. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P. et Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Logiciel]. http://www.praat.org/ [Google Scholar]
  8. Boltanski, L. et Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu, P. et Boltanski, L. (1975). Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1, 2–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brandner, E. (2012). Syntactic microvariation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(2), 113–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burnett, H. (2012). The role of microvariation in the study of semantic universals: adverbial quantifiers in European and Québec French. Journal of Semantics, 29, 1–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82, 32–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coquillon, A. et Turcsan, G. (2012). An overview of the phonological and phonetic properties of Southern French: Data from two Marseille surveys. In R. Gess, et al. (éds.), Phonological Variation in French: Illustrations from Three Continents, Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 105–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Côté, M.-H. (2011). French liaison. In: M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume et K. Rice (éds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Malden (Massachusetts): Wiley-Blackwell, 2685–2710. [Google Scholar]
  16. Côté, M.-H. (2017). La liaison en diatopie: esquisse d’une typologie. Journal of French Language Studies, 27, 13–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Doetjes, J. (2008). Adjectives and degree modification. In: L. McNally et C. Kennedy (éds.), Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dresher, B. E. (2013). Contrastive features and microvariation in vowel harmony. In: NELS 42: Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Toronto (vol. 1, pp. 141–153). [Google Scholar]
  19. Durand, J., Laks, B., Calderone, B. et Tchobanov, A. (2011). Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui? Langue Française, 169, 103–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Encrevé, P. (1988). La liaison avec et sans enchaînement: phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français. Paris: Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fougeron, C., Goldman, J.-P., Dart, A., Guélat, L. et Jeager, C. (2001). Influence de facteurs stylistiques, syntaxiques et lexicaux sur la réalisation de la liaison en français. In: Proceedings of TALN 2001, 173–182. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hale, M., Kissock, M. et Reiss, C. (2007). Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar. Lingua, 117(4), 645–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Henry, A. (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hornsby, David (2019). Variable liaison, diglossia, and the style dimension in spoken French. French Studies, 73, 578–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hornsby, D. (2020). Norm and ideology in spoken French: A sociolinguistic history of liaison. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kayne, R. (1996). Microparametric syntax: Some introductory remarks. In: J. R. Black et C. Motapanyane (éds.), Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, ix–xxviii. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kayne, R. (2000). Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krifka, M. (1995). Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In: G. N. Carlson et F. J. Pelletier (éds.), The Generic Book, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 398–411. [Google Scholar]
  30. Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. et Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamont, M. et L. Thévenot. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, A., Abbou, J. et Burnett, H. (2023). Indexicalité et interprétation du monde social: une analyse socio-pragmatique de la liaison variable. Langue française, 219, 121–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthewson, L. (2001). Quantification and the nature of cross-linguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 145–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayol, L. et Castroviejo, E. (2013). (Non)integrated evaluative adverbs in questions: A cross-Romance study. Language, 89, 195–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In: A. Duranti et C. Goodwin (éds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–358. [Google Scholar]
  37. Podesva, R. (2011). The California Vowel Shift and gay identity. American Speech, 86, 32–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pustka, E. (2017). L’écrit avant l’écriture: la liaison dans les livres audio pour les enfants. Journal of French Language Studies, 27, 187–214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberge, Y. et Vinet, M.-T. (1989). La variation dialectale en grammaire universelle. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. [Google Scholar]
  40. Savoia, L. M. et Carpitelli, E. (2008). Problems in phonological micro-variation in dialects of Northern Italy. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 2, 103–119. [Google Scholar]
  41. Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Solt, S. et C. Umbach. (2017). Microvariation in Semantics, un évènement satellite du congrès Sinn und Bedeutung 22. https://microsem.wordpress.com/ [Google Scholar]
  43. Tagliamonte, S. (2013). Comparative sociolinguistics. In J. K. Chambers et N. Schilling (éds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Hoboken (New Jersey): Wiley, 128–156. [Google Scholar]
  44. Woolard, K. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Towards an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist, 12, 738–748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Woolard, K.B. et Schieffelin (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.